Hate speech radicalization

Define

A process by which an individual or a group comes to adopt increasingly radical views in opposition to a political, social, or religious status quo, using forms of expression which disseminate, incite, promote or justify racism, xenophobia, antisemitism or other forms of intolerance based on hate, including intolerance which is expressed in the form of aggressive nationalism and ethnocentricity, discrimination and hostility to minorities, migrants and people with a migrant background. (Hate speech definition according to the Council of Europe)

Identify

Signs of radicalization:

What makes a person vulnerable to radicalisation?

How does radicalization happen?

Act

Tackling hate speech is crucial to deepen progress across the United Nations agenda by helping to prevent armed conflict, atrocity crimes and terrorism, end violence against women and other serious violations of human rights, and promote peaceful, inclusive and just societies. We can stop radicalization by:

  • blocking online content and access and balancing safety and freedom of expression
  • filtering and removing content
  • empowering online communities to counter the narratives of violent extremism and terrorism
  • promoting positive and alternative messages
  • building digital resilience and media literacy
  • Hold platforms accountable for hate speech
  • Raise awareness of the problem
  • Support people who are targets of hate speech
  • Boost positive messages of tolerance
  • Notify organizations fighting hate about the worst instances you see
  • Legislative Measures: The Challenge of Creating Smart Regulation

Activity 1: Lovers, moderates, radicals

Recommended from 15/16
Participants are divided into 2-3 teams – lovers / moderates / radicals, depending on the number of people. “Lovers” will have a peaceful attitude towards the chosen theme, based more on subjectivism. Moderates will have a pragmatic attitude. Radicals will have an attitude of rejection based more and more on subjectivism. The instructions are given to each separate group.

The prepared material ( videos, social media posts, “fabricated” posts, etc. – from a past event or related to a current situation in real life) is viewed / read to all participants.

Each one reflects individually on the material taking into account the indications received. (team specific) for 5 minutes.

Afterwards, there is a group reflection and an attempt to harmonize an opinion in each group. (about 10 minutes) 

Next step is a debate between the 2-3 teams. Everyone has the right to a presentation of their own vision, then the discussion can be left “free” to see how each team / individual manages to “impose”. (3 minutes / team for  presentation, plus 10-20 minutes for discussions).